Privacy of the person whose data it is and transparency by way of helping other people understand how a model is working. "So you had a whole system of automatic things that were completely not inclusive."Īlso important in building out AI and ML, Kelley said, is privacy and transparency.
#Microsoft chatbot tay best tweets skin#
So it was not very inclusive, because if you had skin colour like mine, which is almost ghostly, it worked just great, but the darker that your skin colour was, the less likely it was to work," she explained. "The designers tested it against the designers skin colour. The advocates claim that reforms to the law would help industry members avoid the losses and hassles from persistent copyright infringement.See also: AI 'more dangerous than nukes': Elon Musk still firm on regulatory oversightĪnother example Kelley shared was a bathroom sensor for washing hands. Signed by a huge collection of major labels and artists, from Perry and Swift to Paul McCartney and Queens of the Stone Age (even Kenny G inked this thing), the petition contends the law is outdated. The artists, copyright holders, and labels argue that YouTube and companies like it use the DMCA to their advantage, largely because the modern world of streaming came into existence well after the law was signed. The two-decades old piece of legislation makes it legal for sites like YouTube to host any piece of user-uploaded content, which makes it nearly impossible to rid the net of illegally-hosted material. When’s the last time you can remember Taylor Swift and Katy Perry agreeing on anything? Well, the embattled pop stars have something in common now: The pair have joined hundreds of musicians and labels who have signed a new petition calling for reforms of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
#Microsoft chatbot tay best tweets upgrade#
Man sets out to sue Microsoft over Windows 10 upgrade nag screen, gets some cash Microsoft employees sue over trauma they claim was caused by viewing extreme content safeguards.Įlon Musk threatens to abandon Twitter acquisition over spam bot dataĪmazon’s biggest sale just got even bigger with a Taylor Swift Prime Day concertĬould Taylor Swift bring Dazzler to life in 'X-Men: Dark Phoenix'? The book, released on September 10, continues to discuss how Smith saw the incident as a lesson in A.I. The singer has also registered several lines from her lyrics. The shortened moniker isn’t the only thing the singer has laid claim to - she also trademarked 1989, the year she was born and the title of one of her songs. The revised chatbot, available on Messenger and others along with Twitter, was later criticized for being too much like a stereotypical teenage girl. But when the chatbot reappeared, Tay was no longer TayTweets but Zo, complete with new program that prevents the bot from broaching politics, race, and religion as topics. When the chatbot began sending out racist tweets, the singer had even more reason for concern. Rather than get in a legal battle with the singer, Smith writes, the company instead started considering new names.
The singer claimed the name violated both federal and state laws. But in the book Tools and Weapons by Microsoft president Brad Smith and Carol Ann Browne, Microsoft’s communications director, the executives have finally revealed why - another Tay, Taylor Swift.Īccording to The Guardian, the singer’s lawyer threatened legal action over the chatbot’s name before the bot broke bad. When the bot was reprogrammed, Tay was relaunched as Zo.
0 kommentar(er)
